Theorems · Inductive type · category theory
CategoryTheory.TransfiniteCompositionOfShape
{C : Type u} →
[inst : CategoryTheory.Category.{v, u} C] →
(J : Type w) →
[inst_1 : LinearOrder J] →
[OrderBot J] → {X Y : C} → (X ⟶ Y) → [SuccOrder J] → [WellFoundedLT J] → Type (max (max u v) w)Given a well-ordered type J, a morphism f : X ⟶ Y in a category C
is a transfinite composition of shape J if we have a well order continuous
functor F : J ⥤ C, an isomorphism F.obj ⊥ ≅ X, a colimit cocone for F
whose point is Y, such that the composition X ⟶ F.obj ⊥ ⟶ Y is f.
- Cited by
- 32 results in Mathlib
- Foundations
- Depth 17 from the axioms · uses propext
Around this declaration
Dashed lines are statement dependencies; solid lines are citations in proofs.
Cites6
Mathlib declarations this one mentions in its statement or cites explicitly in its proof. Plumbing is filtered out.
- CategoryTheory.Categorystatement · cited by 32,673
- Quiver.Homstatement · cited by 32,603
- LinearOrderstatement · cited by 8,572
- OrderBotstatement · cited by 1,055
- SuccOrderstatement · cited by 574
- WellFoundedLTstatement · cited by 491
Cited by71
Results whose statement or proof uses this declaration.
- CategoryTheory.TransfiniteCompositionOfShape.Fstatement and proof · cited by 47
- CategoryTheory.TransfiniteCompositionOfShape.inclstatement and proof · cited by 22
- HomotopicalAlgebra.RelativeCellComplex.toTransfiniteCompositionOfShapestatement · cited by 17
- CategoryTheory.TransfiniteCompositionOfShape.isoBotstatement and proof · cited by 14
- CategoryTheory.TransfiniteCompositionOfShape.isColimitstatement and proof · cited by 7
- CategoryTheory.SmallObject.relativeCellComplexιObjproof · cited by 4
- CategoryTheory.TransfiniteCompositionOfShape.mapstatement and proof · cited by 4
- CategoryTheory.TransfiniteCompositionOfShape.ofArrowIsostatement and proof · cited by 4
- CategoryTheory.TransfiniteCompositionOfShape.icistatement and proof · cited by 3
- CategoryTheory.TransfiniteCompositionOfShape.iicstatement and proof · cited by 3