Theorems · Theorem · ring theory
neg_mul_mem
∀ {R : Type u_1} {S : Type u_2} [inst : Mul R] [inst_1 : HasDistribNeg R] [inst_2 : SetLike S R] [MulMemClass S R]
{s : S} {x y : R}, -x ∈ s → y ∈ s → -(x * y) ∈ sThis lemma exists for aesop, as aesop simplifies -x * y to -(x * y) before applying
unsafe rules like mul_mem, leading to a dead end in cases where neg_mem does not hold.
- Cited by
- 0 results in Mathlib
- Foundations
- Depth 6 from the axioms · uses no axioms
Around this declaration
Dashed lines are statement dependencies; solid lines are citations in proofs.
Cites5
Mathlib declarations this one mentions in its statement or cites explicitly in its proof. Plumbing is filtered out.
- SetLikestatement and proof · cited by 1,084
- neg_mulproof · cited by 654
- MulMemClass.mul_memproof · cited by 173
- HasDistribNegstatement and proof · cited by 114
- MulMemClassstatement and proof · cited by 25
Cited by0
Results whose statement or proof uses this declaration.
Nothing cites this yet.